Manufacturer spotlight: Infiniti

Poll

Vote for your most highly anticipated new green car coming to the UK in 2012

  • View Results
Subscribe to RSS feed. Sign up for our newsletter

Awards won by TheGreenCarWebsite.co.uk

The Green Apple Awards 2011 GreenFleet Award

Information

Archive

Congestion charge is not the answer

 Are all efforts to discourage environmentally unfriendly driving a good thing? Here at thegreencarwebsite.co.uk we prefer to show both sides of the debate – and one journalist is getting his message across loud and clear about the flaws of the system.

Martin Cassini, of fitroads.org, has written a passionate article about the traffic congestion problem in the UK which, according to the CBI, costs the UK economy around £20 billion a year.

He believes that the real blame lies with intrusive traffic control, and above all with 24hr traffic lights which he claims are “badly-phased”, blaming them for jams and hostility. Common sense and courtesy on the roads would prevail were a different system adopted and then, if road capacity is exceeded, a charge may be justified – however, until then, he claims, it is another premature layer of control.

Mr Cassini goes on to state that the congestion charge does nothing to reduce danger and delay at junctions – by contrast, by removing priority the need for lights is removed and road users can take it in turns.

Regardless of whether you believe his solution about the scrapping of 24hr traffic lights is justified or not, he makes some points that are difficult to ignore regarding the congestion charge itself.

He highlights that the eagerly anticipated hydrogen Honda FCX will soon be available in Japan and the USA but not in the UK because of the lack of refuelling infrastructure and that vehicles such as a Lexus with emissions of 192g/km are exempt from the congestion charge simply because they use hybrid technology yet many other vehicles including a Fiat Eco Version, a Seat Ecomotive and a Skoda Greenline are not exempt despite polluting considerably less. 

To read more of Mr Cassini’s opinions, check out fitroads.org.

To summarise he describes the congestion charge as “inept”. But here at thegreencarwebsite.co.uk we want to know what you think? Would you like to see a congestion charge introduced in a big city near you? Do you agree that the concept is inept or do you think it encourages drivers to think green? Leave a comment below with your thoughts.

See also

Author: Paul Lucas, October 14, 2008
Filed under: Green cars,Latest news

1 Comment »

Congestion pricing
“The public has grown accustomed to the notion that roads — most of them at least — should be free, just like parks and public schools. Changing those attitudes will take years, if not decades.”
Firstly the public has a right to free roads, schools and parks,
It is the reason governments are put in a position of power to represent the needs of the people and make those decisions for the benefit of the people.
There is no need to change this opinion!
What is needed is a transportation system that works.
Liquid flow traffic concepts resolve once and for all the roads infrastructure with intersection that allows all drivers at any time to enter and exit an intersection without stopping.
This means you drive across town without stopping at any intersections.
How do you pay for this? By putting in the costs of the economic loss incurred daily into the infrastructure.
The annual budget alone will pay for these intersections.
Take a look at http://www.ubtsc.com.au and see models of intersections that allow you to do what today you can only imagine.
Welcome to the 21st Century.

Comment by Jozef Goj — October 14, 2008 @ 5:26 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Popular posts

Image: Biofuels: the pros and cons
Image: Hybrid cars: a guide
Image: LPG conversion: a helpful guide
The Green Piece
Available UK charge points for electric vehicles