SaveMoneyOnCars.co.uk
Subscribe to RSS feed. Follow us on Twitter.

Search

Poll

Can advanced non-food source biofuels offer a truly environmentally-friendly fuel solution?

Newsletter

Receive the latest news direct to your Inbox! Simply enter your email address below to sign up for our weekly newsletter.
Privacy Policy

UK Aware 2010
GreenFleet Award

News Categories

Show categories | Hide categories

Archive

Show archives | Hide archives

Pages

Show pages | Hide pages

Meta

Electric car use could ‘lead to rise in emissions’

The use of electric cars could actually lead to a rise in emissions, a damning new report reveals.

According to the independent scientific and research association, the European Federation for Transport and Environment (T&E), electric cars have the potential to help cut carbon emissions but loopholes in current EU legislation could mean they help to contribute to a rise in greenhouse gas emissions across Europe.

European Commission President José Manuel Barroso called in September for transport and electrical supply to be ‘decarbonised’, highlighting the development of electric cars as a key aim.

However binding EU targets for car CO2 emissions agreed last December include ‘supercredits’ that enable carmakers to sell up to 3.5 gas-guzzling SUVs for every electric vehicle they sell and still reach their official EU target. Electric cars are also counted as ‘zero emissions’ despite the fact that the electricity they use can come from high-carbon fossil fuels such as coal.

The combined effect of these loopholes would be that carmakers who choose to market electric cars to meet EU targets, would have to do less to reduce emissions of conventional cars. The overall effect would be higher CO2 emissions and oil use.

Supercredits are also included in legislation proposed last month to improve the CO2 emissions of vans.

T&E is calling for current and future loopholes to be dropped and CO2 / fuel efficiency standards to be tightened further.

The report argues that industry and policymakers have relied in the past on distant ‘dream’ technologies to solve environmental problems rather than setting targets for CO2 emissions and fuel efficiency. Hydrogen, biofuels, and earlier interest in electric cars all came to nothing for different reasons but what they have in common is that they all distracted policymakers from forcing carmakers to improve fuel efficiency across the board.

Jos Dings, director of Transport & Environment said: “The game for policymakers is cutting emissions and reducing our dependence on oil, not promoting electric cars. The EU must not take its eye off the ball again, and get distracted by technological hype. For electric cars to be a success for the environment, and for the industry, pressure on fuel efficiency and CO2 emissions for all cars must be kept up. Promoting electric cars without maintaining pressure on fuel efficiency standards, will kill any chance of success.”

The report also examines the implications of electric cars for the power sector. It argues that the EU needs to think hard about how it will ensure that the extra demand for electricity is met through renewable electricity and not more dirty coal. It notes that every car will need to be fitted with ‘smart meter’ technology to measure how much electricity is being consumed, and where that electricity came from.

Supercredits are due to be phased out in 2016, but electric cars will remain counted as zero-emissions.

The report, “How to Avoid an Electric Shock – Electric Cars from Myth to Reality” is available from www.transportenvironment.org

Author: Faye Sunderland, November 12, 2009
Filed under: Green credentials

5 Comments »

“Electric cars are also counted as ‘zero emissions’ despite the fact that the electricity they use can come from high-carbon fossil fuels such as coal.” Why do all articles make this quote yet never mention that electric motors are much more efficient than petrol engines so contribute less CO2 even if the source is a Coal Power Station.

Comment by Tim Raine — November 12, 2009 @ 12:26 pm

The problem is this: the overall fuel efficiency of the total energy chain from coal to el-car movement is aprox half that of a modern car engine. That’s not all: local pollution from powerstations are often a much greater cause for health issues than that of car exhaust since petrol is a much cleaner fuel than coal, and the engine technology for cars is well in advance of that of powerstations. My nine year old Mercedes estate car consumes from 5,1 to 7,5 l/100km. It is capable of pulling a 2100kg trailer, handles well even in snowy winter roads, has great comfort and reliability (has done more than 400000km) and is great value. In my opinion electric cars will never come close to that of a modern diesel. Someone got an alternative?

Comment by Ola Dahl — November 14, 2009 @ 12:52 am

“The problem is this: the overall fuel efficiency of the total energy chain from coal to el-car movement is aprox half that of a modern car engine”

Um…why do you compare the whole energy chain for electric vs JUST the engine in the non-electric?

If you compare apples to apples you’ll find they’re pretty similar and THAT assumes a current situation where it is powered by 100% coal and disregards any improvements in reducing the percentage of carbon in electric generation which is a KEY goal of most governments.

The same idiot people that smugly exclaim that electric vehicles are being “powered by coal” are the ones holding up the introduction of non carbon alternatives. Eg… “No way! We can’t use electric cars because they’re powered by dirty coal. No way! We can’t built solar and wind because they are intermittant and we have no large storage system in place”

Anyone else see the stupidity in this argument? Electric cars are the perfect solution….the ONLY thing holding them back is price and this will come down with mass production and as technology improves.

Comment by Steve — November 16, 2009 @ 2:23 am

This is spin from the petrol and internal-combustion engine lobby which is not backed up with any figures.

Electric vehicles are between 75% and 90% more efficient than petrol and diesel engines. While coal is burned to produce electricity, right now in the UK 20% of electricity is produced from non carbon sources (nuclear and renawables). Add the this the efficiency of EV’s the switch from oil powered fuels to electric gives a reduction on C02. Not an increase.

As for air pollution. Electric vehicles produce no tail pipe emissions. It is estimated that 19,000 deaths a year can be directly attributed to road
traffic emissions (tinyurl.com/ydlyxcw). Coal fired power station emissions can be controlled and limited at source.

Ecotricty (www.ecotricity.co.uk) have calculated that you would only need a 12% increase in grid capacity to run all the cars and vans in the UK as electric vehicles. This is due to the efficiency of electric vehicles, the fact that you can charge them at night when the grid has low demand. That 12% could be covered by renewables, which would produce 0 increase in C02 emissions.

Comment by marc — November 16, 2009 @ 6:56 pm

It is arguable whether electric cars are more (or less) efficient than internal combustion engines.

The point is they don’t work because they only go for a few miles before recharging which takes hours. That’s why there aren’t any. Look out of your window!

Comment by Dave Henderson — December 2, 2009 @ 2:16 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

On the forum...

Latest from ContractHireAndLeasing.com

Latest from FleetDirectory.co.uk

ETA - Join the drive for greener motoring