Manufacturer spotlight: Vauxhall

Poll

Should UK Government look to privatise our roads?

  • View Results
Subscribe to RSS feed. Sign up for our newsletter

Awards won by TheGreenCarWebsite.co.uk

The Green Apple Awards 2011 GreenFleet Award

Information

Archive

Image illustrating our Kindle Touch competition.

Forget carbon dioxide – what about sulphur dioxide emissions?

Much of the world’s focus is on reducing carbon dioxide emissions – but have we overlooked the emissions of sulphur dioxide (SO2) in the process?

According to a new analysis appearing in the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, emissions peaked in the 1970s and then decreased until 2000 – only to increase again in recent years due to emissions in China, international shipping and developing countries.

The authors suggest that anthropogenic emissions have resulted in vast increases in sulphur deposition near more industrialised areas. These emissions can be detrimental to ecosystems and harm aquatic animals and plants. They can also form sulphate aerosols that can have a significant effect on global and regional climates.

In order to determine how much sulphur has been emitted the team collected data sets from more than 140 countries and went back as far as the 1800s. The factors determining total emissions include fuel consumed, its sulphur content and any pollution controls that are employed.

Since 1980 the fraction of sulphur from petrol and coal has remained constant at 50 per cent and 30 per cent respectively. However, particularly noteworthy is the phenomenal growth of China whose share of emissions came in at 28 per cent in 2005 – up from just two per cent in 1950.

See also

Paul Lucas, February 16, 2011
Filed under: Global warming,Latest news

1 comment

Alex Kovnat

We could make headway against sulfur dioxide emissions in the USA by using nuclear power instead of coal-burning for generation of electricity. Unfortunately the neurotic intellectual element doesn’t want nuclear power. During the 1970′s, when a lot of anti-nuclear doctrine was being formulated, we knew about sulfur in coal. What the public wasn’t told at that time though, was that coal contained not only sulfur but also mercury and other toxic heavy metals.

February 16, 2011

Leave a comment

Popular posts

Image: Biofuels: the pros and cons
Image: Hybrid cars: a guide
Image: LPG conversion: a helpful guide
The Green Piece
Available UK charge points for electric vehicles