Manufacturer spotlight: Vauxhall

Poll

Should UK Government look to privatise our roads?

  • View Results
Subscribe to RSS feed. Sign up for our newsletter

Awards won by TheGreenCarWebsite.co.uk

The Green Apple Awards 2011 GreenFleet Award

Information

Archive

Image illustrating our Kindle Touch competition.

Reports differ on future of natural gas vehicles

Just what role will natural gas play as a transportation fuel in the future? Reports by the MIT and the IEA offer differing views.

The MIT report is focused on the US and concludes that natural gas use in the transportation sector is likely to increase. While compressed natural gas (CNG) will play a role it suggests that the chemical conversion of gas into some form of liquid fuel may be the best pathway to market penetration. Meanwhile, the IEA takes a more conventional approach and assesses the impact on the penetration of vehicles burning gas as their fuel. 

According to the MIT, the CNG vehicle market segments should offer an attractive payback period in the near term with high mileage use. However, for light passenger vehicles, even at 2010 petrol prices, the high incremental cost of CNG vehicles means there are longer payback times for the average driver so significant penetration of CNG in the passenger fleet is unlikely in the short-term.

However, it highlights that the potential for natural gas to reduce oil dependence could be increased by conversion into room temperature liquid fuels that can be stored at atmospheric pressure. Of these fuels, methanol is seen as the one that can be produced for a long period at a large industrial scale.

Meanwhile, the IEA believes there are a number of benefits for natural gas vehicles including fuel cost savings and reduced greenhouse gas emissions. However, there are many barriers limiting their growth such as the lack of refuelling infrastructure and the higher purchase price or conversion cost.

As such it expects the uptake of natural gas vehicles to remain limited unless there is significant investment; with the most likely source of demand coming from Asia and Latin America.

See also

Paul Lucas, June 12, 2011
Filed under: Latest news

1 comment

Alex Kovnat

A basic problem with the gas-to-liquids approach is, you lose a significant percentage of the energy content of each pound of natural gas converted to, for example, methanol. So I believe that for large vehicles that can accomodate the weight and size of compressed natural gas cylinders (which must withstand 3,600 pounds per square inch pressure), CNG would be the better way to go.

If buildup of carbon dioxide in our planet’s atmosphere is so serious as to justify 35, and then eventually 60+ miles per gallon CAFE for the cars we drive, then there should be subsidies for school districts to convert school bus fleets to run on CNG. CNG burning engines could be used in conjunction with hybrid drive systems for further reduction in CO2 per working day.

What would really be helpful, would be developments in synthesis chemistry to convert methane (the principal constituent of natural gas) directly into methanol without the wasteful process of reforming to carbon monoxide and hydrogen, followed by methanol synthesis.

June 13, 2011

Leave a comment

Popular posts

Image: Biofuels: the pros and cons
Image: Hybrid cars: a guide
Image: LPG conversion: a helpful guide
The Green Piece
Available UK charge points for electric vehicles