Manufacturer spotlight: Vauxhall

Poll

Should UK Government look to privatise our roads?

  • View Results
Subscribe to RSS feed. Sign up for our newsletter

Awards won by TheGreenCarWebsite.co.uk

The Green Apple Awards 2011 GreenFleet Award

Information

Archive

Image illustrating our Kindle Touch competition.

Will new technologies make electric cars unnecessary? The Green Piece.

It’s widely accepted that the electrification of the automobile is just around the corner with governments and car manufacturers alike pouring huge resources into making electric cars roadworthy and a match for the vehicles of today.

However, what if existing technology could advance at such a rate that electric cars were no longer needed? Surely that would be the ideal solution, saving huge amounts of money and preventing the inevitable infrastructure overhaul? But is it actually possible? A newly published report by the Committee on the Assessment of Technologies for Improving Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy of the US National Research Council (NRC) investigated the issue.

Cost effective

According to its investigation, combinations of commercially available technologies could potentially reduce fuel consumption vastly over the next 15 years without the need for any compromise to vehicle safety or performance; and without adding too much additional cost for consumers.

engineIts estimates show that a full combination of improved technologies in medium and large cars with spark ignition engines could reduce fuel consumption by around 29 per cent, while only costing the consumer an additional $2,200. Meanwhile, replacing spark ignition engines with diesel engines and components could yield fuel savings in the region of 37 per cent while adding $5,900 to the average cost of a vehicle. Hybrid engines meanwhile would reduce fuel consumption by 43 per cent but add $6,000 to the average cost of a vehicle.

New technology

The report suggests that spark ignition engines will continue to be the primary source of propulsion in the US over the next 15 years and that new technology will help reduce fuel consumption dramatically.

Among the improvements already introduced is friction reduction; reduced pumping losses through advanced valve-event modulation; cooled exhaust gas recirculation; improved overall engine architecture, including downsizing; and thermal efficiency improvements.

Cylinder deactivation is also seen as one of the most effective methods in reducing fuel consumption. When applied to six cylinder and eight cylinder overhead valve engines, it can reduce fuel consumption by around four- to 10 per cent. Other techniques include turbocharging and downsizing; stoichiometric direct injection; and valve-event modulation, the latter of which not only reduces fuel consumption but can also cause a slight increase in engine performance which offers further opportunities for engine downsizing.

Compression ignition technologies will also have a significant role to play with the committee finding that replacing a 2007 model year SI petrol powertrain with a base-level compression ignition diesel engine with advanced six-speed dual-clutch automated manual transmission would reduce fuel consumption by an incredible 33 per cent.

According to its findings, the advanced level compression ignition diesel engines expected to reach the market in the 2011-2014 timeframe could reduce fuel consumption by an additional 13 per cent in larger vehicles and by seven per cent for small vehicles.

What about hybrid technologies?

The fuel consumption benefit of a full hybrid is thought to be around 50 per cent at an estimated incremental cost of $3,000-$9,000 depending on the vehicle’s size and specific hybrid technology.

Hybrid systemAt the heart of this improved fuel consumption is a complete vehicle redesign to incorporate features such as improved aerodynamics; low-rolling resistance tyres; and more.

It is thought that most of the improvements in hybrid vehicles over the next 10-15 years will occur from reduced costs of hybrid powertrain components as well as improvements in battery performance such as more lifetime charges.

Our verdict – more than just buying time

Some critics might claim that there should be a wholesale push towards electrification now and that further investments in improving internal combustion engines are a waste of time as their days are numbered.

Certainly improved technologies aren’t going to make the electric car obsolete. On the contrary, battery electric vehicles will almost certainly be marketed on a wide scale within the next 15 years. However, that’s still a significant time period and for battery electric vehicles to take a sizeable market share, infrastructure will need to be in place, consumers will need to be educated as to their benefits and prices will need to slump significantly.

As such, internal combustion engines are here to stay as the dominant force for several decades yet and so taking all the steps possible to drive down their emissions and reduce fuel consumption is vital in the battle against oil dependency and with the need to improve environmental performance. The improvements will also allow electric vehicle technology to advance and prices to drop to the point that they are accessible for a much wider group.

So these investments and new technologies aren’t just about buying time during a transitional phase – they are essential improvements the motoring industry should thrive on for a long time to come.

See also

Faye Sunderland, June 21, 2011
Filed under: The Green Piece

4 comments

Emil

Improving won’t help as they will just add complications = higher number of failures = more repairs. Electric cars should simplify it and reduce maintanence costs quite dramatically.

June 22, 2011

josealb

I have to disagree with your article

In Europe we introduced all these improvements years ago. The fuel economy of a European car is twice or more that of an American. And yet we have cities with pollution way above the healthy and legal limits.

The combustion engine is at its end in my opinion no matter how you put it, at least with gas.

Electric vehicles will have their problems. But combustion engines just can’t last for several decades anymore. Or do you think anyone in 20 years is going to pay even more than we’re paying for gas today?

By the way are you a British or an American website? Since the direction is .co.uk but the article is expressed in $

June 23, 2011

Faye Sunderland

Hi Josealb

Thanks for your thoughts and valid points you raise. You are quite right, European efforts so far have not been enough to tackle dangerous levels of air pollution and road transport is a massive part of the problem. But finding the solution to that problem is difficult and no current tech is without its faults.

We are indeed British, but the figures above mention $ because we’re referencing research from the US National Research Council. We take a global view and look at all countries but are as British as crumpets I promise!

June 23, 2011

Sid

A good, realistic article.

The internal conbustion engine is here to stay for the forseeable future, and that’s not a bad thing!

Current engines, economical as they might seem, are actually still wasting most of their fuel. There is huge scope for improvement by improving fuel delivery, valve timing, heat loss (ceramics), electrification of peripheral components, etc.
I expect to see fuel efficiency double again within 20 years and emissions cut dramatically.

The increase in complexity is an unfortunate side-effect, but the effects of this could be reduced if manufacturers would collaberate to produce more generic components (i.e standardise more), though sadly I don’t see this happening!
It is important that we don’t reduce the life expectancy of cars by making them unserviceable.
Let’s not forget 40% of a car’s CO2 and pollutant emissions come from the manufacturing process, so making them last longer makes green sense.

I’d also like to see a reversal in the trend towards heavier cars. An obsession with safety-ratings and equipment levels has meant that weights have increased over 40% since the ’70s, which is obviously not making the best use of the improvements in engine efficiency.

To sum up, there’s a lot of scope for green car improvement, but some of it will need a change in attitudes from manufacturers AND consumers.
However, I firmly believe the internal combustion engine remains a big part of that future.

Electric cars aren’t ready. More importantly, neither is the clean electricity we’d need to support them. Give it another 30 years to improve batteries, then bring on nuclear fusion powerstations and maybe it will all change. Perhaps then we’ll be ready to kiss our piston-engines a fond goodbye!

August 3, 2011

Leave a comment

Popular posts

Image: Biofuels: the pros and cons
Image: Hybrid cars: a guide
Image: LPG conversion: a helpful guide
The Green Piece
Available UK charge points for electric vehicles