Manufacturer spotlight: Vauxhall

Poll

Should UK Government look to privatise our roads?

  • View Results
Subscribe to RSS feed. Sign up for our newsletter

Awards won by TheGreenCarWebsite.co.uk

The Green Apple Awards 2011 GreenFleet Award

Information

Archive

Image illustrating our Kindle Touch competition.

Electric cars: The key questions, answered. The Green Piece.

June 28, 2011. The Green Piece Column.

For every blog and article written hyping the virtues of electric cars as the transportation method of the future, there are just as many belittling their credentials – and with Tesla announcing the end of production for its Roadster (see article) last week and electric car maker Think driving straight into bankruptcy (see article) it appears critics have had more emission-emitting fuel poured on to their fire.

Think

So are electric cars all hype and no hope? Here we address the three key questions often posed by the naysayers to determine their future.

Question one: Are electric cars really better for the environment?

Electric cars are often promoted as “zero emission” vehicles – which critics jump on as false advertising, because while they produce no harmful emissions at the exhaust pipe, the clean air benefits are limited based on how the electricity is sourced.

According to estimates from the MIT Electric Vehicle team, an electric vehicle charged from the existing US grid emits about 115g/km of carbon dioxide (CO2) on a well-to-wheel analysis, compared to a conventional US-market petrol car that averages 250g/km. However, in Europe, where many of the most efficient cars have emissions below 115g/km, the advantages are much more limited.

Perhaps the crucial element that critics overlook is that the goal is to produce electricity from renewable sources – for example, in France, which has a clean energy grid, well-to-wheel CO2 emissions from an electric car would be just 12g/km. Only in a worst case scenario would incremental electricity demand be met by coal – in reality, it is much more likely that the electricity we use will continue to get cleaner and so the environmental advantages of electric cars will only expand further.

Question two: Will electric cars save drivers money?

As much as many of us might like to think we are environmentally motivated, in these tough economic times it’s hard not to think about our budgets and so it’s no surprise that many potential drivers are put off by the high price tags associated with electric cars.

It’s true that electric cars are generally more expensive than petrol cars primarily because of the high cost of batteries. This is a major stumbling block with a survey undertaken by Nielsen for the Financial Times showing that 65 per cent of Americans and 76 per cent of Brits are not willing to pay more for an electric car than for a petrol car. However, there are signs that electric car prices could come down – the Renault Fluence ZE, for example, will be priced at less than $20,000.

Affordable? Fluence Z.E

However, perhaps the most important consideration is long term costs. Nissan estimates that the five-year operating cost of the LEAF electric vehicle, for example, would be $1,800 – this compares to around $6,000 for a comparable petrol car.

Question three: Will electric cars run out of charge before I reach my destination?

Ah, range anxiety. Surely this is the biggest stumbling block towards the progression of electric cars – and who will ever forget that infamous, and controversial, image of the Tesla Roadster running out of power on the Top Gear test track?

Cars with internal combustion engines can of course be considered to have an indefinite range because they can be refuelled so easily and quickly. By contrast, many electric cars have been targeted on the statistic that the average American drives fewer than 40miles each day and so they have been developed for urban driving. However, there are a number of electric cars with a far more substantial range. The Tesla Roadster, for example, can travel 245miles per charge.

Range aplenty: the Tesla Roadster

The key of course, is the development of electric car infrastructure. DC Fast Charging Stations are being implemented across the US and it is hoped that by 2013 they will cover the entire country. There are similar developments elsewhere too, with Australia recently placing itself at the forefront of the electric car race thanks to an agreement with battery swap station supplier Better Place (see article).

Our verdict – Electric cars have the answers

The image of electric cars is slowly changing and with it, the doubts surrounding their future appear to be disappearing.

The questions raised are certainly justified. Electric cars with limited range and high price tags will struggle to appease consumers; but these issues are being addressed because as more vehicles come to market prices will fall, and ranges are already expanding even with so little infrastructure so far in place.

Of course electric cars would defeat their own object if they were more harmful to the environment than the petrol cars they replace – but most analyses suggest that they are already ahead of their counterparts and that the electricity they use should only get greener as time goes on.

So perhaps it’s time to stop asking questions and start embracing the future – and for governments to take the steps that are necessary to make electric cars the norm and no longer just a niche alternative.

Faye Sunderland.

See also

Faye Sunderland, June 28, 2011
Filed under: Electric cars,The Green Piece

3 comments

Richard Becker Sr

I agree with your verdict! I own a Nissan LEAF and it more than meets my needs for range in San Diego County. Charging at Super off-peak rates, driving costs me LESS THAN 2 CENTS PER MILE. SDG&E is a relatively clean provider of electricity and my carbon footprint has been reduced by about 85% over my gas guzzling Jeep. Best of all…the LEAF is fun to drive.

June 28, 2011

JW

Three comments:
First, sorry to grumble….I do get frustrated when commentators compare EV ‘well-to-wheel’ emissions with tailpipe emissions for internal combustion; please be consistent..if you want to compare ‘well-to-wheels’ you need to add in another 20-30% for a standard vehicle emissions (notwithstanding of course that manufacturers quoted emissions figures for standard vehicles, produced as they are by a highly skilled driver on a standard cycle, completely misrepresent real world experience!)
Secondly, you have not highlighted the potentially significant positive environmental impact EVs would have removing damaging exhaust emissions from our streets.
Thirdly, and most importantly, your section on range anxiety falls into the common EV trap. EVs won’t compete with internal combustion on range until the cost of storing a kWh of energy falls to a few cents (ie probably never). No amount of fast charging stations changes the dynamic that storing a unit of electric charge is a lot more expensive (and a lot heavier) than storing the same unit of energy in liquid fossil fuel making EVs heavier and more expensive. But then I always say that society didn’t wait for Shell stations to be on every street corner before we started using internal combustion vehicles…actually it was the other way round.

June 29, 2011

carol

As far as I have been told electric cars give off huge amounts of radiation. The hype has over looked this fact. They work in reverse phase or polarity. There were two EMC laws. One for military & one for civilian eqipment. In the UK the government filed the military verison at the DTI. It removed a layer of government that being the Radio communications Ageancy & BT’s equivalent. It’s allowed industry to sell what was band equipment. To the civilan market where engineers don’t understand the change in phase. The motor runs backwards or reverse polarity. This had a number of different names, partical collider, it produces nuclear energy. It’s also an inverter. Being the same it is also used in newer trains. Fuel cell is another name. The radiation is non-hertzian. This is also stealth technology if you don’t know the power or the code just like mobile phones or computers you don’t know the output. Dr Henry Lai says that Tarza guns are stealth way to increase the T-waves in the heart. Leading to heart attacks & strokes. They call it low level radiation. But it’s very powerful, the sign wave needs reading from the bottom. It’s call zero point energy Nick Cook has written a book but it’s not really understood. Neither do others. This technology can be made undetactable as in stealth planes, they can no longer be traced by heat source. It does not comply to EMC law. They were banned from petrol station forecourts for interferance on pumps. We have short memories.

April 13, 2012

Leave a comment

Popular posts

Image: Biofuels: the pros and cons
Image: Hybrid cars: a guide
Image: LPG conversion: a helpful guide
The Green Piece
Available UK charge points for electric vehicles