Manufacturer spotlight: Vauxhall

Poll

Should UK Government look to privatise our roads?

  • View Results
Subscribe to RSS feed. Sign up for our newsletter

Awards won by TheGreenCarWebsite.co.uk

The Green Apple Awards 2011 GreenFleet Award

Information

Archive

Image illustrating our Kindle Touch competition.

Consumers want stricter fuel economy standards, CFA says

As the US considers introducing new, much stricter fuel economy standard for new cars, one federation reckons a new 56.2 mpg standard by 2025 is just what consumers want and will help consumers save $6,00 per vehicle compared to the current 2016 standard.

New research from the Consumer Federation of America (CFA), an independent, non-profit group representing 300 consumer groups finds that the new 56.2mpg standard would also help cut gasoline consumption by one-third, insure US car companies remain competitive across the globe and substantially reduce dependence on foreign oil.

Moreover, the Federation says that consumers want fuel efficient cars to make running them more affordable.

“56 mpg by 2025 provides the President with a road map to help consumers cope with volatile gas prices and responds to American’s deep concern over our dependence on foreign oil,” said Mark Cooper, CFA’s Director of Research. “Setting a requirement of 56 mpg by 2025, enables car companies to gradually reach the standard that consumers want. In addition, any increase in the cost of the vehicle will be immediately offset by savings at the pump,” said Cooper.

The new fuel economy proposal is under consideration by the Obama administration and would represent a 5 per cent increase in fuel economy annually up to 2025, compared with the 35.5mpg standard in place for 2016.

However the Center for Automotive Research (CAR) has expressed a different opinion, a recent report from the center suggesting that new higher Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards could boost the price of a typical car sold in the US by as much as $9,790 while reducing new car sales by up to 5.4 million units a year, potentially eliminating as many as 265,000 American jobs.

Representatives of the White House are believed to be in discussion with the auto industry, with a decision on the revised fuel economy standards expected by September.

What do you think. Will the fuel economy standards help or hinder the US? Leave a comment below.

See also

Faye Sunderland, June 29, 2011
Filed under: Green credentials

1 comment

Alex Kovnat

The self-designated “Consumer” Federation of America is IMHO, practicing deceit, fraud and quackery.

If you ask the typical man or woman in the street “Would you like a car that can get 60 miles per gallon?” most of them would understandably say yes. But what if you told the truth about the engineering sacrifices that auto manufacturers might have to make to attain said fuel economy? Such as, greatly increased cost of buying said vehicle to begin with. And then there’s another issue, besides just initial purchase cost.

So far, even a mediocre car will accelerate from 0 to 60 miles per hour (a little less than 100 kilometers per hour) in roughly 15 seconds. But if those who have a philosophical peeve against the private auto have their way, and if automotive manufacturers are squeezed harder and harder on fuel economy, we may end up having to settle for cars that take 30 seconds, perhaps even a full minute, to accelerate to 60 miles per hour.

And if the powers that be keep on demanding more and more of both fuel economy and crash protection, we may have to settle for cars that can’t attain said speed at all, in any length of time. We may end up having to settle for travel at speeds of no more than 45 miles per hour.

Of course those who argue for such draconian regulations will argue that otherwise, the world will come to an end from global warming. Even if that is so, that still doesn’t justify lying to the public, or withholding information, or otherwise deceiving people as to the price we may have to pay for 60 miles per gallon fuel economy requirements.

It is ironic that the consumer movement was founded in the first place as a reaction against false advertising claims. The so-called Consumer Federation of America, in arguing for draconian fuel economy laws by citing the results of polls among people who have not been told the possible cost of said mandates, is practicing false advertising.

June 29, 2011

Leave a comment

Popular posts

Image: Biofuels: the pros and cons
Image: Hybrid cars: a guide
Image: LPG conversion: a helpful guide
The Green Piece
Available UK charge points for electric vehicles