Manufacturer spotlight: Vauxhall

Poll

Should UK Government look to privatise our roads?

  • View Results
Subscribe to RSS feed. Sign up for our newsletter

Awards won by TheGreenCarWebsite.co.uk

The Green Apple Awards 2011 GreenFleet Award

Information

Archive

Image illustrating our Kindle Touch competition.

Ford examines Rankine cycle waste heat recovery system

A study by Ford suggests that an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) waste heat recovery system using R245fa as the working fluid could supply the full vehicle accessory electrical load in a light duty vehicle on the highway cycle.

Presented at the Directions in Engine-efficiency and Emissions Research Conference in Detroit, the study showed that in city driving the ORC system would only supply about half of the accessory load requirement for a conventional engine; and only a third of the load requirement for a hybrid powertrain.

At the moment the Rankine cycle is being widely used commercially to generate power in stationary power plants – and it is also being considered as a potential waste heat recovery system for light-duty and heavy-duty vehicles.

The system includes a pump, evaporator, expander and condenser with the working fluid pumped into the evaporator where it is vapourised by heat. It then flows to the expander where it can be used to generate electricity – and then it comes back to the condenser where it cools back into a liquid and starts the cycle again.

According to the researchers, the ORC for a light-duty vehicle can generate enough electricity to partially offset or even nearly fully offset accessory load on the vehicle.

In addition, the Ford team found that the backpressure with ORC waste heat recovery under this design was a little lower than the baseline system.

See also

Paul Lucas, October 11, 2011
Filed under: Ford,Green cars,Latest news

1 comment

Alex Kovnat

Big trucks and buses (I’m thinking more of highway buses, i.e. Greyhound Lines, than urban transit buses) could use Rankine exhaust heat energy recovery systems now, if the owner-operators really wanted to. Why don’t they? A more reasonable question to ask is, why should truck or bus operators spend money to purchase and maintain the doodads you need for this system, if fuel isn’t all that expensive? This is one good reason why governments shouldn’t subsidize fossil fuels.

October 11, 2011

Leave a comment

Popular posts

Image: Biofuels: the pros and cons
Image: Hybrid cars: a guide
Image: LPG conversion: a helpful guide
The Green Piece
Available UK charge points for electric vehicles