Manufacturer spotlight: Vauxhall

Poll

Should UK Government look to privatise our roads?

  • View Results
Subscribe to RSS feed. Sign up for our newsletter

Awards won by TheGreenCarWebsite.co.uk

The Green Apple Awards 2011 GreenFleet Award

Information

Archive

Image illustrating our Kindle Touch competition.

Weighty cars reduced fuel economy improvements, report finds

Improvements in the fuel economy of cars is being hindered by the increasing weight and power of cars according to new research by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

Contrary to common perception, automakers have actually made huge leaps in the fuel efficiency of cars in recent decades through advancements in technology,  the Institute reports. But sadly these improvements have hardly translated into increased the miles to the gallon of cars on the road, thanks to bulging waistlines and more horsepower.

tailpipeStudying all the cars sold in the US over the last three decades, the Institute found that average fuel economy improved just over 15 per cent-a relatively modest improvement. But, while focusing on cars sold in the States between 1980 and 2006, the report also found that the average curb weight of those vehicles increased 26 per cent, while their horsepower rose 107 per cent. All factors being equal, fuel economy actually more than doubled (60 per cent) during that time, as MIT economist Christopher Knittel reaffirms in the new research paper, “Automobiles on Steroids,” just published in the American Economic Review.

Thus if Americans today were driving cars of the same size and power that were typical in 1980, the country’s fleet of autos would have jumped from an average of about 23 miles per gallon (mpg) to roughly 37 mpg, well above the current average of around 27 mpg.

Instead, Knittel says: “Most of that technological progress has gone into [compensating for] weight and horsepower.”

While the US is well known for its love of large, heavy vehicles, even here in Europe, cars have historically got heavy since the 1980s. Back in the States, Knittel reports that a major reason why  fleet-wide mileage has only slowly increased is that so many Americans have chosen to buy bigger, less fuel-efficient vehicles. In 1980, light trucks represented about 20 per cent of passenger vehicles sold in the United States. By 2004, light trucks — including SUVs — accounted for 51 per cent of passenger-vehicle sales. Furthermore, gas prices dropped 30 per cent between 1980 and 2004, when adjusted for inflation.

However no gas prices are rising and as consumers and governments look for improvements in economy, Knittel calculates that car makers could meet the new CAFE fuel economy standards by simply maintaining the rate of technological innovation experienced since 1980 while reducing the weight and horsepower of the average vehicle sold by 25 per cent.

See also

Faye Sunderland, January 4, 2012
Filed under: Latest news

1 comment

Alex Kovnat

Has it occured to MIT that an important reason why fuel economy improvements have not kept pace with technological advances in engines and transmissions is, more stringent safety requirements? For example: in recent years, while we have kept automakers feet to the fire regarding CAFE, the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has also doubled roof crush strength requirements. And in the future, NHTSA will require increased air bag protection to prevent unbelted drivers from being ejected through open windows in rollover accidents.

I believe that if it weren’t for increased stringency regarding safety requirements since 1990, any of a number of economy cars available then would by now be achieving 50 miles per gallon CAFE with the improvments in powertrain technology that occurred during the 1990-2010 timeframe. But every time automakers come up with efficiency improvements in powertrains, the powers-that-be demand more safety. Hence we have used efficiency improvements as enhancements to safety at least as much as enhancement to fuel economy.

Finally, the reason why many families purchase SUV’s is, people with children need more room and carrying capacity. You cannot expect any mother or father to cram 3 hyperactive bundles of energy into the back seat of a small car. And with increased fuel economy requirements, sedans big enough for families have been regulated out of existence. The SUV’s and vans purchased in their place, tend to be even more fuel-thirsty. So much for rationality and reason when the emotional and ego needs of intellectuals are considered more important than the practical needs of everyday people.

January 4, 2012

Leave a comment

Popular posts

Image: Biofuels: the pros and cons
Image: Hybrid cars: a guide
Image: LPG conversion: a helpful guide
The Green Piece
Available UK charge points for electric vehicles